Skip Nav

Custom Hotel Rwanda by Paul Rusesabagina essay paper writing service

Movie and Television Analysis Paper

❶In the early stages of the film, as the ruthless annihilations are just beginning, Rusesabagina meets Jack a journalist. It also shows proceedings at the International Criminal Tribunal in Arusha at which the leaders of the Rwandan genocide are being tried for crimes against humanity.

Our Services

Contribute to This Page
2004, 121 minutes, Three Academy Nominations
Thursday, 11 August 2011

Reluctantly, Paul takes them in and bribes a Rwandan army officer to allow him to bring them to the hotel. This is only the beginning of the flood of refugees to come to the hotel. In total, the number of Tutsis and moderate Hutus sheltering in the hotel and its grounds would rise to over 1, As the violence worsens, the UN withdraws most of its peacekeeping force there to implement the Arusha Accords that ended the civil war , leaving roughly soldiers behind. Foreign governments send in troops, but only to evacuate their citizens, many of whom are guests at the hotel.

The head of the UN peacekeeping force, distraught over the withdrawal of his troops, tells Paul to look at himself from a Western perspective to try and understand why the international community has abandoned them—because they are African.

Paul holds firm, and through his connections, his guile, and his courage, he manages to save not only himself and his family, but also 1, innocent people. The history of the peoples of Rwanda and its neighboring countries is complex and disputed, so inevitably this movie contains some simplifications. For instance, a conversation between a journalist and a Rwandan at the hotel bar gives the impression that there were no social distinctions between Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda before Belgian colonial rule.

The reality was not so simple. Prior to Belgian colonial rule, it seems that were distinctions between Hutu and Tutsi, but they were primarily economic rather than racial.

The Tutsis were the aristocracy and the Hutu were the common people. It was not impossible to change status, and "become" a powerful Tutsi which means "rich in cattle" or an ordinary Hutu. The Belgians heavily favored the Tutsis and exacerbated and codified the formerly flexible divide between the two groups. To see Dallaire's version of events as well as his struggle and work after the genocide, we suggest reading Shake Hands with the Devil or watching the documentary based off the book and his experiences.

At the beginning of the film, Paul places far greater value on protecting his family than protecting his neighbors.

But as the film progresses his sense of obligation to his neighbors and his countrymen deepens. Indeed, rather than abandon the refugees he is sheltering, he sends his family to safety while he stays behind. Is his decision the morally right one? In making decisions, how much weight should one give to the welfare of one's family compared to the welfare of one's neighbors?

How much weight should governments give to the welfare of foreign peoples compared to that of their own citizens? The UN Colonel tells reporters that his troops are "peace-keepers," not "peace-makers.

If the Colonel had disobeyed orders and authorized his troops to fire on Interhamwe fighters, would he have done the right thing? Do you agree that racism played a role in the international community's failure to act to stop the genocide, as the UN colonel says?

The film makes no mention of other possible contributing factors, such as the disastrous U. Does this justify the U. The film shows that there was a close relationship between the French and Hutu governments, even while the killings were going on.

On the tenth anniversary of the genocide, Rwanda's president accused the French of consciously training and arming the Hutus, knowing that they would massacre Tutsis. The French deny this, yet it is indisputable that France was the Rwandan government's number-one supplier of weapons.

Does this fact alone make France more culpable for the genocide than the rest of the international community? How should responsibility be allocated for what happened, both inside and outside Rwanda? How has the international community, in particular Belgium, France, the United States, and the UN, faced up to the question of responsibility and blame in the years since the genocide? In , world leaders formally adopted the Responsibility to Protect [R2P]—the duty to intervene in when national governments fail to fulfill their responsibility to protect their citizens from atrocious crimes—and in the UN Security Council passed Resolution , which commits the Council to protect civilians during armed conflicts.

France, one of the five permanent members of the Security Council of the UN , has been accused of a role that some of those answerable to France refute and who claim that Operation Turquoise was an exemplarily humanitarian intervention. Some use as context that in supporting a group that would become genocidal, and who, according to the French parliamentary report, did not hide their genocidal intentions, France would have favoured the launching of the genocide. Ten years later, during the year , books , films , radio programmes and television shows have brought the controversies surrounding France's role in Rwanda back to life.

Unsatisfied by the conclusions of the report from the parliamentary mission for Rwanda, some citizens and NGOs have formed a citizens' enquiry commission. On April 7, a serious diplomatic incident took place between France and Rwanda during the commemoration of the genocide in Kigali. In the course of the ceremonies, the Rwandan President publicly accused France of not having apologised for its role in Rwanda while desiring to participate in the ceremonies.

In July , the ministers of Foreign Affairs from the two countries convened in order to "share the work of a memory piece " about the genocide. Rwanda announced several days later, according to a dispatch from Agence France-Presse from August 2, , that "the council of ministers has adopted the organic law project to aid in the creation of the independent national commission charged with assembling proof of the implication of France in the genocide perpetrated in Rwanda in On October 22, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda officially demanded that the "Republic of France" allow former ambassador Jean Michel Marlaud and one of his military representatives, officer Jean Jacques Maurin to respond to the demand of the defence of the presumed mastermind of the genocide: Colonel Bagosora pending judgement.

On November 27, in a televised debate on France 3 , after the showing of the French film "Tuez les Tous" English: On April 6, Rwandan president Paul Kagame repeated the charges against France as "direct role of Belgium and France in the political preparation for the genocide" in an interview with Jeune Afrique magazine.

On August 5, , an independent Rwandan commission said France was aware of preparations for the Rwanda genocide and helped train the ethnic Hutu militia perpetrators. It accuses France of training Hutu militias responsible for the slaughter, helping plan the genocide, and participating in the killings. The report accused 33 senior French military and political officials on Tuesday of involvement in the genocide. After events surrounding the Battle of Mogadishu in Somalia the year prior, the US refused to provide requested material aid to Rwanda.

Dallaire was directly "taken to task," in his words, for even suggesting that UNAMIR should raid Hutu militants' weapons caches, whose location had been disclosed to him by a government informant. The role of the United States is directly inspired by their defeat that they underwent during their intervention in Somalia in For two months, from April to May , the American government fought over the word "genocide" which is banned by the [23] Convention for the Prevention and the Repression of Crime and Genocide adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10 December Senior US officials privately used the word genocide within 16 days of the start of the killings, but chose not to do so publicly because Clinton had already decided not to intervene.

Intelligence reports obtained using the US Freedom of Information Act show the cabinet and almost certainly the president had been told of a planned "final solution to eliminate all Tutsis" before the slaughter reached its peak.

Clinton and Albright would both later expressed regret for their inaction. Clinton provided major funding for the Rwandan genocide memorial in Kigali, and visited Rwanda in and He apologized both times, and "expressed regret for what he says was his 'personal failure' to prevent the slaughter of an estimated , people there in In the government of the United States declassified documents, which confirm the attitude of the United States of not having taken into account the reality of the situation starting in January Council members at first acknowledged that lack of governments provided the un-political stop to the massacres and admitted many mistakes made by them in tackling the issue.

After the death of ten Belgium soldiers, the United Nations reported the removal of most 2, peace keepers. Canadian Foreign Minister, Lloyd Axworthy stated "none present could look back without feeling guilt and devastation at the lack to help the Rwandan civilians at their time in need" BBC News. Even as the council stopped short and delivered an apology, fifteen council members focused on a report about lessons to be learned.

It was based on the lack of support and help in Africa. The United Nations presents a core policy and a great challenge to prevent another round of genocidal violence. The councils have already evidently learned how to bring peace from lessons of past failures.

Annan commissioned the report and was publicly criticized for not delivering warnings about the upcoming genocide. Kofi Annan has accepted the conclusions based on recorded reports. The United Nations has been criticized for inaction. Next in line when it comes to responsibility is France, which moved in too late and ended up protecting the genocidaires and permanently destabilizing the region; and the U. The Guardian on April 12, , [29] stated that when viewing a woman "being hauled along the road by a young man with a machete":.

This information included the location of Interhamwe arms caches and information preceding the genocide that the Interhamwe were compiling a list of all the Tutsis in Kigali. The informer was Jean-Pierre Twatzinze, who has been asked to compile the list. According to Barnett, UN inaction stemmed from its desire not to get involved in a potentially PR-risky operation which could damage the prospects for future peacebuilding operations, given that 18 UN troops had recently been killed in Somalia, even though UN troops had the capacity to save thousands of lives.

The delivery was in violation of the cease-fire clauses of the Arusha Accords, which prohibited introduction of arms into the area during the transition period.

Formally recognizing this point, the French government argued that the delivery stemmed from an old contract and hence was technically legal. Dallaire was forced to give up control over the aircraft. They both fled the UK shortly after the revelations.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from Role of the international community in the Rwandan Genocide. The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. May Learn how and when to remove this template message. Human skulls at the Nyamata Genocide Memorial Centre.

Initial events Chronology Gikondo massacre Nyarubuye massacre. People indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal. This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. August Learn how and when to remove this template message. United human rights council. The United Human Rights Council.

Archived from the original on Retrieved 14 April Zed Books, pp. National Defense and the Canadian Forces. The prevention of the Rwandan Genocide. Retrieved 20 September Mission d'information sur le Rwanda".

Retrieved 22 May French Accused in Genocide". The New York Times.

Buy Hotel Rwanda by Paul Rusesabagina essay paper online

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Hotel Rwanda is a movie based on true history in historical drama, about the hotelier named Paul Rusesabagina played by a man named Don Cheadle. This took .

Privacy FAQs

Read this essay on Hotel Rwanda Reaction Paper. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at dailysocial.tk".

About Our Ads

Free Essay: Summer Summer A partial requirement for RS2 A partial requirement for RS2 “Hotel Rwanda” Teresa Gonzales Yulo BEEN 4 A Reaction Paper. Isagani Dionela Hotel Rwanda Facts About the Movie: The story of the movie revolves around Paul Rusesabagina in his gamble to save 5/5(1).

Cookie Info

Below is a free excerpt of "Hotel Rwanda Reaction Paper" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Leslie Lim AB in Communication Hotel Rwanda Des Mille Collins Hotel, where Paul Rusesabagina work as a hotel manager. Summer Summer A partial requirement for RS2 A partial requirement for RS2 “Hotel Rwanda” Teresa Gonzales Yulo BEEN 4 A Reaction Paper on the movie.